Post by jamesm on Feb 22, 2016 22:50:01 GMT -5
I'm not sure whether this thread is still active or not, but it has been rather enlightening to me. I am one of those descendants of Jane Glasson and David Pope and I too had simply taken for granted the accuracy of family trees posted by others, specifically the ones found on familysearch: familysearch.org/ark:/61903/2:1:M7F5-WQD
It would seem information on here sheds new light onto that casting doubt onto which parents are correct for Charles Glasson se the above post which reads:
Joanna Richards, wife of Samuel Richards of Camborne said that I am the mother of Charles Glasson whose wife and children are now chargeable to the parish of Camborne - my son was born in lawful wedlock and is my son by my first husband Charles Glasson deceased. My said son is about 38 years of age and when he was about a year and a half old my late deceased husband Charles Glasson took the estate of Landrine in the parish of Ladock in the said County of the late Matthew Vivian esquire at rent for a term of fourteen years. He agreed to pay Matthew Vivian as the yearly rent for the same estate the sum of eighty pounds. He entered on the said estate and held it for four years and a half and I and my family including my son Charles resided with my husband at Landrine for all the time he held it. In the month of June 1830 my said sons wife Anna Maria together with their two children James and Sarah were removed by an order of two magistrates acting in and for the East Division of teh Hundred of Penwith from the parish of Camborne to the parish of Ladock aforesaaid. My said son has done no act to acquire a settlement in his own right.
The mark of Joanna Richards.
I'd be curious to know where this information came from in order to determine whether Jane Glasson's father was this Charles:
familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HY-DCXS-7RP?mode=g&i=45&wc=3CBC-82W%3A138123201%2C138460601%2C1582890705%3Fcc%3D1769414&cc=1769414
or this Charles:
familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HY-DCXS-Q5V?mode=g&i=22&wc=3CBC-82W%3A138123201%2C138460601%2C1582890705%3Fcc%3D1769414&cc=1769414
Any help or insights would be greatly appreciated!
It would seem information on here sheds new light onto that casting doubt onto which parents are correct for Charles Glasson se the above post which reads:
Joanna Richards, wife of Samuel Richards of Camborne said that I am the mother of Charles Glasson whose wife and children are now chargeable to the parish of Camborne - my son was born in lawful wedlock and is my son by my first husband Charles Glasson deceased. My said son is about 38 years of age and when he was about a year and a half old my late deceased husband Charles Glasson took the estate of Landrine in the parish of Ladock in the said County of the late Matthew Vivian esquire at rent for a term of fourteen years. He agreed to pay Matthew Vivian as the yearly rent for the same estate the sum of eighty pounds. He entered on the said estate and held it for four years and a half and I and my family including my son Charles resided with my husband at Landrine for all the time he held it. In the month of June 1830 my said sons wife Anna Maria together with their two children James and Sarah were removed by an order of two magistrates acting in and for the East Division of teh Hundred of Penwith from the parish of Camborne to the parish of Ladock aforesaaid. My said son has done no act to acquire a settlement in his own right.
The mark of Joanna Richards.
I'd be curious to know where this information came from in order to determine whether Jane Glasson's father was this Charles:
familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HY-DCXS-7RP?mode=g&i=45&wc=3CBC-82W%3A138123201%2C138460601%2C1582890705%3Fcc%3D1769414&cc=1769414
or this Charles:
familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HY-DCXS-Q5V?mode=g&i=22&wc=3CBC-82W%3A138123201%2C138460601%2C1582890705%3Fcc%3D1769414&cc=1769414
Any help or insights would be greatly appreciated!
