Well - I'm back just 5 minutes (
) and I've already found them in the 1841 Census.
Problem is that I don't know whether this information will help or hinder the cause.
It 'may' help by process of elimination but ...
1841 Census
St Ives FOLIO 19 Page 2
Back Road
Hanna DAVIS, 20, In County
William do., 1, In County
That's all and there ain't no more!
Now - is this helpful or does it hinder us all just that little bit more.
We are trying to determine whether William and Johanna had a son named John so let's see what facts we have.
I have just checked online and now have the dates that all the Census from 1841 to 1891 were taken.
Circa 1839/40 - son William born (1841 Census age 1)
June 6th 1841 - Census taken
June 5th 1842 - daughter Johanna born at St Ives (Cornishmaid)
In FreeBMD the only John DAVIS born in the period 1840-1844 at Penzance RD was in the September Qtr of 1844.
The nearest John DAVIES in that period was born in the Redruth RD iin the March Qtr of 1840.
This last fellow can be discounted as a child of William and Johanna given the likely birth date of the first child William.
Likewise the 1844 fellow can probably be discounted because the second William was born about 1844/5 according to the 1851 Census.
In fact, according to FreeBMD, William was born in the September Qtr of 1844 also.
A Question - Could John and William have been twins?
Given the information already produced here I would say the answer is a definite NO.
By all accounts John was definitely born about 1841/2.
If he were a son of William and Johanna we know he could not have been born in 1842 because we know daughter Johanna's birthdate.
And he was not born before June of 1841 or he would have been in the Census with his mother given he could only have been a few months old.
Given William and Johanna were married in August of 1839 I should think John is hanging by a very thin (and rapidly weakening) thread. ;D
If William was born within a month or so of the marriage (not unusual) then we might just squeeze John in but .... he still does not appear in the Census!
The only way John could be part of this family and born about 1841 would be if he were born sometime after June 6th 1841 and (I should think) definitely no later than August of that same year.
Guess what! - Can't find William in 1839 or 1840 either.
I suggest that if we have not found John (or William for that matter) yet with several of us having searched then it is probable we are not going to find a record of his birth in the GRO.
Do not be overly concerned about that as it was not unknown for this to happen.
I have a Christopher Trewhella for whom I could find no record of Birth. I knew approximately when and where he was born from the Census and other records but could not find a birth record.
What I did find was his Baptism.
So I would suggest some effort be put in to searching the Parish Registers for some record of him - and that may well mean searching all the little Chapel Registers as well.
One further point I will make.
Although the old and familiar 'naming pattern' was well and truly on the wane by this time - IF John were to be a son of William and Johanna he would have to have been the second child and that begs a question.
Who was he named for.
By my records there is no sign of a John in the family of William or of Johanna.
I think John is rapidly drifting away from the ship me hearties. ;D
Back to the Census for a moment.
As William was a 'fisherman' he was probably at sea at the time of the Census which would explain his non-appearance.
Amy and Cornishmaid - I copied that Census page to my hard drive so will send a copy to each of you as an email attachment.
CT