Post by Cornish Terrier on Nov 18, 2008 6:58:05 GMT -5
Without the old 'copy and paste' I just need to make a couple of comments for the moment.
The identity of Thomas NOALL (husband of Paul QUICKs widow) is something I have considered in the past and I agree it very likely that he was the one baptised in 1751 son of Richard and Mary.
Wanted to do a bit more of a study of the NOALL family with some input from Cornishmaid before I made the final decision.
Regardless of whether or not Thomas of 1751 married Elizabeth - he was buried at St Ives 27th February 1833 at the age of 82.
And we may not have to worry too much about the children's names, particularly the lack of a Richard NOALL occuring here as Elizabeth already had a son by that name to Paul QUICK.
Further to that is that Paul and Elizabeth had only the two sons - Paul and Richard QUICK.
Thomas and Elizabeth NOALL named their first three children Thomas, Elizabeth and MARY.
Perhaps a further suggestion that Thomas was indeed the son of Richard and Mary.
TREVAN/TREVORROW - same thought had crossed my mind when composing my notes last night.
I did have a look, but it was a very brief look, to see if I could see a link but had no immediate success so left it for 'drekkly'.
Might have another go at it shortly as it does 'appear' to be an obvious solution.
Gandolf - In case you missed it I also made an error although in my case I think you would call it a 'blunder' ;D
Good thinkg Lannatna picked up on it.
This Thomas and Catherine was the couple married at Crowan with she being born Catherine LAITY.
I am going to have a bit more of a look at the clans of UREN and TREVORROW for a short time to see if I can find any hint of a link to Robert QUICK.
Will post any results.
The identity of Thomas NOALL (husband of Paul QUICKs widow) is something I have considered in the past and I agree it very likely that he was the one baptised in 1751 son of Richard and Mary.
Wanted to do a bit more of a study of the NOALL family with some input from Cornishmaid before I made the final decision.
Regardless of whether or not Thomas of 1751 married Elizabeth - he was buried at St Ives 27th February 1833 at the age of 82.
And we may not have to worry too much about the children's names, particularly the lack of a Richard NOALL occuring here as Elizabeth already had a son by that name to Paul QUICK.
Further to that is that Paul and Elizabeth had only the two sons - Paul and Richard QUICK.
Thomas and Elizabeth NOALL named their first three children Thomas, Elizabeth and MARY.
Perhaps a further suggestion that Thomas was indeed the son of Richard and Mary.
TREVAN/TREVORROW - same thought had crossed my mind when composing my notes last night.
I did have a look, but it was a very brief look, to see if I could see a link but had no immediate success so left it for 'drekkly'.
Might have another go at it shortly as it does 'appear' to be an obvious solution.
Gandolf - In case you missed it I also made an error although in my case I think you would call it a 'blunder' ;D
Good thinkg Lannatna picked up on it.
I have Thomas & Catherine Uren having a son George Uren (chr. 1798 Lelant) who married 1825 at Lelant to Mary Ann Trevorrow (chr. 1796
This Thomas and Catherine was the couple married at Crowan with she being born Catherine LAITY.
I am going to have a bit more of a look at the clans of UREN and TREVORROW for a short time to see if I can find any hint of a link to Robert QUICK.
Will post any results.