|
Post by newlyn on Jan 25, 2009 17:04:46 GMT -5
Sorry I misunderstood you.
You could always start a Barker thread on this page with the info you have.
|
|
|
Post by Cornish Terrier on Jan 26, 2009 2:10:47 GMT -5
The following link has just 'come my way' and I suggest a look through it. freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~peterscornishfamily/index.htmI have checked the KING section and, unfortunately, nothing there to help in identifying James and Mary. However - the fact that there is nothing here means that I can probably eliminate this infmation and then work from the rest. There is also a section, amongst many others, for the PELLOW family. Seems these people are 'stuck' with the identity of ANN TREMELLEN who married JOHN PELLOW. I reckon we might just be in a position now to help them out. I will take another look through this all tonight and, if I can locate some comtactdetails, send off a message outlining what we have found in recent days. CT
|
|
|
Post by londoner on Jan 26, 2009 6:47:01 GMT -5
The 1841 census I found for Alice King was: St Hilary Dist 12 HO 107/144 part 2 Book 3 folio 47 page 7 Relubbus :Alice King 22 servant in the household of William Milldren, innkeeper. Next door (Folio 48 , p 8 ) is Charles King 20 servant in the household of William Tyack, Yeoman
May be a bit too old - but they may have been baptised late? Will keep looking for Mary.
The James King who died age 69 in Nov 1841 was of Relubbus Lane and therefore his wife (as at census) was Jane
Also there is a burial of Charles age ?7 of Lower Downs in 1831 (age probably 1 or 2 would fit Charles Vincent) which is probably why he is not with Mary in 1851 and rules out the one above
|
|
|
Post by Cornish Terrier on Jan 26, 2009 12:03:04 GMT -5
Ref - 1841 Census Sorry Londoner but that cannot be the Alice I am looking for. Alice maried Jhn TREWHELLA in 1855 and I have her in the Census all the way through until her death in 1891. In the Census her age consistently reflects a birth about 1833 and that is obviously not quite correct. Even less correct is her age of 54 when she died in 1891 - that would place her birth about 1836 given she died in March. And Charles Vincent KING married in 1850 and again in 1860 so he was certainly still alive and kicking in 1841 - SOMEWHERE! I had not checked the Census for that particular James who died in 1841. Thankyou for the information and it is another one deleted from the list. The search continues.
|
|