Post by Cornish Terrier on Nov 5, 2008 12:05:09 GMT -5
That be the one me darlin'. 
And Gandolf 'may' be correct with his identity of the Champion family from what I can see.
The 1851 Census entry for James and Ann could be correct too but I would be much more happy with it if I could find baptisms for Margaret and Joseph.
Joseph is not so much of a problem but I would have expected Margaret to appear in the CFHS Ludgvan Baptisms which cover up until 1840 - especially given that John, Edward and William Henry are there and her age suggests she would have been born between John and Edward.
And there is still the problem of identifying James himself.
I suspect his mother (or perhaps a sister) was named Susan given he named daughters Susanna, Susan and Susan but I have so far not been able to find a match for him.
And Gandolf 'may' be correct with his identity of the Champion family from what I can see.
The 1851 Census entry for James and Ann could be correct too but I would be much more happy with it if I could find baptisms for Margaret and Joseph.
Joseph is not so much of a problem but I would have expected Margaret to appear in the CFHS Ludgvan Baptisms which cover up until 1840 - especially given that John, Edward and William Henry are there and her age suggests she would have been born between John and Edward.
And there is still the problem of identifying James himself.
I suspect his mother (or perhaps a sister) was named Susan given he named daughters Susanna, Susan and Susan but I have so far not been able to find a match for him.
