Hi again Roger
Ok, so CT has told you James Curnow 1807 was son of Wm Curnow & Mary Richards who married at Zennor 1802. OPC shows that at this marriage 12 December 1802, tinner William Curnow signed his name; the witnesses were Wm Richards & Henry Daniell.
Their children can be found sequentially on OPC by careful studying of children baptized to Wm Curnow & wife Mary:
William Curnow 26 Dec 1803 St ives
John Curnow 24 March 1805 St Ives
James 1 Feb 1807 St Ives we know
Robert Richards 3 June 1811 St Ives is a likely candidate; a bit of a gap before him is filled by the burial of Robert Richards Curnow 25 December 1808 St Ives, son of Wm & Mary
Next, either Matthew Curnow 8 August 1813 St Ives or Hannah Curnow 28 November 1813 Zennor of Treveal. But you know from in-depth discussions on another thread that Hannah belongs to a different Wm Curnow & Mary; so, Matthew Curnow 8 August 1813 St Ives
Mary Curnow 1 October 1815 St Ives
Ann Curnow 15 December 1816 St Ives belongs here… marries Edwin Daniel in St Ives 1840
Are there any suitable age Wm Curnow & wife Marys in 1841 census?
Well, there’s Wm Curnow & Mary both age 65 (i.e. 65 – 69) in Halsetown; also present Wm Curnow age 9 (sounds like grandson age) & Alice Curnow tailor age 20 – 24.
The Wm & Mary at Amalveor in Towednack age 50 (50 – 54) we have discussed elsewhere – and would have been underage to marry in 1802.
So, Wm Curnow & Mary at Halsetown 1841 age 60 – 64. Likely daughter Alice at home.
So post 1816 Ann we have Alice Curnow 20 June 1819 St Ives. I'll leave you to check for later children.
Back to Wm & Mary. Searching for a Mary Curnow c age 72 in 1851, I find a 73 year old
widow, born St Ives, resident with a Francis Gill & wife Mary born St Ives. I find a married pauper William Curnow age 75 in the Helston workhouse, born Towednack; not an ideal fit of facts. So Wm Curnow father of James Curnow & gfather of Francis Curnow has probably died…. A good fit would be 18 August 1844 St Ives age 68. If this be him, then that would give a
birth year of c.1776.
There are several Wm Curnows baptised around that time, which requires a full elimination game of all the families (which I've done, but you will want to do yourself
)….. although the more obvious candidate would be the baptism of a Wm Curnow to a father named William, given William Curnow & Mary Richards named their 1stborn William, which at that time was normally for the father’s father, rather than for the father.
Looking at the naming pattern for Wm Curnow & Mary Richards’ children, we have :
William – for father’s father, or father?
John – for Mary’s father? No – see below. For a brother of William?
James – for a brother of William?
Robert Richards – definitely from Mary’s side! So is there a Mary born c1778 St Ives (per 1851 census information) to a Robert Richards? Yes. So this was probably the 1st of the sons to be named for Mary’s side of the family, firming up the likelihood that John & James were brothers of William Curnow.
Matthew – Robert & Joan Richards, Mary’s parents, had a son Matthew. In fact, their complete set of children per OPC seem to be Robert, John, Matthew, William, Mary, Ann.
(Why no Joan for Mary’s mother?? Don’t know.
)
But anyway, the male names in Mary Richards’ family are all covered, meaning the name James is definitely from William Curnow’s side of the family; and the name Alice isn’t among Mary’s siblings either, so it seems William Curnow had a sister or mother called Alice.
Well, there’s an Alice Curnow 1772 Zennor to father William; OPC shows apparent siblings Elizabeth 1774, William 1776, John 1780, James 1783, Mary 1786. Hmm, a set of boys called William, John & James: good fit for the names of Wm Curnow~Mary Richards’ sons.
And the baptism record for John 1780 Zennor names his mother as Alice – a William Curnow married Alice Richards 1772 Zennor. Witnesses Job Richards & David Curnow.
Not many David Curnows around, so that should help!
I’ll leave you to digest all that & do some checking of records yourself now.
Sue