Post by Mal on Jun 11, 2009 17:18:56 GMT -5
Hello there...
Was having a bit of a discussion with a professional, and experienced, Irish genealogist about ages and a few things popped up that this gentleman had experienced in Ireland, including his own family research, that may be worth keeping in mind for us Janners.
1. The nearest five years.
At first census recorders rounded ages up or down to the nearest five years, as most of us have found out, however word got around amongst the "simple" folk that this what one "ought to do". Therefore when giving their ages, they started rounding up and down themselves- given the low level of numeracy that some of our ancestors had... I'm sure you can imagine.
2. Wedding ages.
One had to be of "full age" i.e. 21 or over to marry without parental consent. This could prove a problem when a father was deceased or, as ever, the parents did NOT consent. What was the solution? People were creative with the truth. In days with no passports or demands for i.d. every five minutes, no computerised record checking etc I suppose it must have been a lot easier to add the odd year or two.
So if you have a few "issues" with census ages, certificate ages, and baptisms, deaths etc not matching up exactly, especially if they are out by a year, then do not despair!
Finally, I know of one defininte case of an ancestor of mine who lied about his age so he could serve in the First World War, he gave his age as 18 when in fact it was 17. I have had to point this out to several researchers and the Imperial War Museum too!!!
Hope that helps, or encourages!
M
Was having a bit of a discussion with a professional, and experienced, Irish genealogist about ages and a few things popped up that this gentleman had experienced in Ireland, including his own family research, that may be worth keeping in mind for us Janners.
1. The nearest five years.
At first census recorders rounded ages up or down to the nearest five years, as most of us have found out, however word got around amongst the "simple" folk that this what one "ought to do". Therefore when giving their ages, they started rounding up and down themselves- given the low level of numeracy that some of our ancestors had... I'm sure you can imagine.
2. Wedding ages.
One had to be of "full age" i.e. 21 or over to marry without parental consent. This could prove a problem when a father was deceased or, as ever, the parents did NOT consent. What was the solution? People were creative with the truth. In days with no passports or demands for i.d. every five minutes, no computerised record checking etc I suppose it must have been a lot easier to add the odd year or two.
So if you have a few "issues" with census ages, certificate ages, and baptisms, deaths etc not matching up exactly, especially if they are out by a year, then do not despair!
Finally, I know of one defininte case of an ancestor of mine who lied about his age so he could serve in the First World War, he gave his age as 18 when in fact it was 17. I have had to point this out to several researchers and the Imperial War Museum too!!!
Hope that helps, or encourages!
M