Some more on the family of Thomas and Charlotte.
In the 1841 Census they are recorded as YOURN (a reflection on the pronunciation!
and amongst their children is eldest son Thomas whose age is recorded as 12.
If accurate then Thomas was born about 1828 or 1829 yet Thomas and Charlotte were not married until 27th August 1831.
To be a son of Thomas and Charlotte then he would have to be either an illegitimate child or a son of Thomas from a previous marriage. Problem here is that Thomas was recorded as a bachelor when he married Charlotte.
AHA - got 'im!
Thomas Uren son of Charlotte Jeffery of St Austell baptised 27th October 1829 at St Agnes
The next part of the problem will probably require a bit more work to sort out and it concerns the exact identities of both George Uren and Emily Faull.
From what I have been able to find it appears that George is almost certainly the son of Thomas and Charlotte yet the original information from JudyLynn casts some doubt on this.
George son of Thomas and Charlotte was baptised in January 1833 yet the information from JudyLynn states that the husband of Emily Faull was born in October of 1836. The discrepancy is almost four years.
BUT - I do have both marriage records which strengthen the case for him being son of Thomas and Charlotte.
In the first marriage in 1862 he was age 29 and recorded as George Jeffery Uren. The marriage was in June so he could have been born in late 1832 which matches nicely with a January 1833 baptism.
But when he married Emily Faull his in 1863 his age was recorded as 28!
The old 'get one year older and reduce age by two trick'! ;D
And then the Census records indicate he was born about 1835 or 1836 and it is from there that his age seems to remain consistent. This then all indicates that the information in the death records in the US is not accurate.
I would suggest that the actually birth date might be correct but that the year is in error and should be 1832 rather than 1836.
More of a problem is Emily Faull whose birthdate in the original information is given as 1843.
The marriage record in 1863 states that she was age 18 which means she should have been born about 1845 yet the only Emily Faull I can find with a father named William was not baptised until 1848 which would have her at age 15 when married!
The record I have found is:-
Emily daughter of William and Sally Faull of Wheal Rose baptised 29th August 1848 at St Day
In 1841 William and Sally are at North Downs, Redruth and with them is daughter Emily who is then age 3.
There is another family with a daughter Emily who was age 9 in 1851 but that family is of John and Sarah Faull. The marriage record for Emily shows her father as William.
I think I might have to sleep on this one!
CT